Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600 is 354 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $74.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 22% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.57 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349636 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
128
98.46153846153847%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
78.0821917808219%
Price, $
$94.05
78%
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349636 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |