Buy on Amazon
$102.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $102.02 vs $160.91
- Up to 32% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-9400 - $0.63 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than FX-8320 - 174 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
93.67816091954023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
68.4782608695652%
Price, $
$160.91
63%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-9400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores 2. 90 GHz up to 4. 10 GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W Processors BX80684I59400
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
