Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2947 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $178.02 vs $216.23
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 263% better in Diablo IV than FX-8320E - 338 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 66% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8320E - $0.64 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280816 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
338
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$216.23
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $216.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |