Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 23% better in Valorant than FX-8320E - 839 vs 683 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than FX-8320E - $150.95 vs $178.02
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than FX-8320E - $0.18 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
683
81.40643623361144%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
69.23076923076923%
Price, $
$178.02
84%
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354399 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
839
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |