Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 912 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $178.02 vs $195.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 7 1700 - $1.16 vs $1.21 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8320E - 161 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280933 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |