Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 2620 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 74% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8320E - 158 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-8320E - $160.99 vs $178.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than FX-8320E - $1.02 vs $1.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
91
57.59493670886076%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
52.04081632653062%
Price, $
$178.02
90%
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354395 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |