Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $178.02 vs $218.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11500 - $1.16 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8320E - 177 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280933 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
93%
Price, $
$218.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |