Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $178.02 vs $205.5
- Up to 2% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i7-10700KF - $1.22 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Saints Row than FX-8320E - 166 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280941 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
98%
Price, $
$205.5
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280942 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |