Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 988 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 59 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $199.9 vs $788.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.39 vs $14.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349699 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
93.22033898305084%
Value, $/FPS
$14.34/FPS
23.640167364016737%
Price, $
$788.88
25%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
79.17511832319134%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |