Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - 256 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $98.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.43 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
72.88135593220339%
Price, $
$150
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360459 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
88.671875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
36.40718562874252%
Multi-Core
1043
18.004488175384083%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |