Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2260 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6350 - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $100.0 vs $132.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.86 vs $1.1 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
78.18181818181817%
Price, $
$132
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359684 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
116
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |