Buy on Amazon
$195
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $195.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 10% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-10900F - $1.62 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 1700 - 136 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
120
88.23529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350028 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
90%
Price, $
$244.77
79%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
59.96420047732697%
Multi-Core
5100
60.52694042250179%
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
