Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2410 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $46.41 vs $450.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.3 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 172 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
90.11627906976744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
11.450381679389313%
Price, $
$450
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.39791787160208%
Multi-Core
825
8.225324027916251%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |