Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $46.41 vs $522.99
- Up to 89% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-13900K - $0.25 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G1820 - 230 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
188
81.73913043478261%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
11.013215859030836%
Price, $
$522.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
16.509751176866175%
Multi-Core
825
4.0946992257296015%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |