Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 274 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $46.41 vs $549.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-5930K - $0.22 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1820 - 231 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
208
90.04329004329004%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349693 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
9.243697478991598%
Price, $
$549.95
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349694 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
42.47404844290658%
Multi-Core
825
15.054744525547445%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |