Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 912 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $46.41 vs $651.07
- Up to 92% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6950X - $0.39 vs $5.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
90.76923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.01/FPS
7.784431137724551%
Price, $
$651.07
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
37.915057915057915%
Multi-Core
825
9.766781105718007%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |