Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $46.41 vs $567.98
- Up to 85% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900 - $1.05 vs $7.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 82% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 80 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
44
55.00000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349702 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.1/FPS
14.7887323943662%
Price, $
$567.98
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
18.091378039793664%
Multi-Core
825
5.0225252648240595%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |