Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $46.41 vs $545.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9800X - $0.39 vs $4.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 131 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
90.07633587786259%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349631 minutes ago
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.89181286549707%
Multi-Core
825
11.219910240718074%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |