Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 639 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 61% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $46.41 vs $118.64
- Up to 61% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Pentium G4400 - $0.3 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 157 vs 155 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
98.72611464968153%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
39.473684210526315%
Price, $
$118.64
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $118.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |