Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $39.95 vs $445.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.32 vs $2.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 24% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3900 - 153 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
123
80.3921568627451%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349387 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
10.996563573883162%
Price, $
$445
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.31777909037212%
Multi-Core
992
9.981887703763332%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |