Buy on Amazon
$39.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $39.95 vs $515.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.26 vs $2.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
90.69767441860465%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
8.695652173913043%
Price, $
$515
7%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
