Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $39.95 vs $458.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-12900 - $0.36 vs $3.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 15% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3900 - 127 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
86.61417322834646%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.61/FPS
9.97229916897507%
Price, $
$458
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
23.49373230893651%
Multi-Core
992
7.605029132168046%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |