Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $39.95 vs $593.77
- Up to 91% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-13600KF - $0.34 vs $3.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 153 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
77.77777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
8.762886597938145%
Price, $
$593.77
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
21.150345831816526%
Multi-Core
992
6.435290301654232%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |