Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $39.95 vs $498.95
- Up to 92% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-4765T - $0.36 vs $4.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 2% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3900 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
98.21428571428571%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.45/FPS
8.089887640449438%
Price, $
$498.95
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |