Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $39.95 vs $567.98
- Up to 91% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900 - $0.34 vs $3.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 29% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 153 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
77.77777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.71/FPS
9.164420485175203%
Price, $
$567.98
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
21.407516580692704%
Multi-Core
992
6.039206136612687%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |