Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 365 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $39.95 vs $549.95
- Up to 92% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-5930K - $0.34 vs $4.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
92.96875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349631 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
7.906976744186048%
Price, $
$549.95
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
50.259515570934255%
Multi-Core
992
18.1021897810219%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |