Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $98.02 vs $345.85
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $0.63 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3930 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
156
91.22807017543859%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
31.18811881188119%
Price, $
$345.85
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $345.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
37.323511356660525%
Multi-Core
1043
13.575426265781596%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |