Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $50.0 vs $110.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 3600 - $1.79 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 107% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G4900 - 58 vs 28 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
28
48.275862068965516%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
93.717277486911%
Price, $
$110.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
38.57232310582342%
Multi-Core
1051
15.267286461359674%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |