Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $50.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 45% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6700T - $0.4 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 137 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
91.24087591240875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
54.79452054794521%
Price, $
$99.9
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.071005917159766%
Multi-Core
1051
29.47279865395401%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |