Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $50.0 vs $113.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-11400F - $0.45 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G4900 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
48.387096774193544%
Price, $
$113
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
31.412544620091793%
Multi-Core
1051
13.814405888538381%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |