Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 385 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $50.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-9100F - $0.26 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 200 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
95.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
45.6140350877193%
Price, $
$115
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
44.832605531295485%
Multi-Core
1051
28.645407467974927%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |