Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $70.0 vs $113.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11400F - $0.57 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 154 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
79.87012987012987%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
78.0821917808219%
Price, $
$113
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
25.956144824069355%
Multi-Core
1018
13.380651945320714%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |