Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2303 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $70.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i3-9100F - $0.57 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-3210 - 141 vs 122 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
122
86.52482269503547%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349269 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
69.51219512195121%
Price, $
$115
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
37.04512372634643%
Multi-Core
1018
27.745979831016626%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |