Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $70.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 32% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-10400F - $0.27 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-3210 - 279 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
257
92.1146953405018%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
67.5%
Price, $
$112.53
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
35.39638386648122%
Multi-Core
1018
17.701269344461835%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |