Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 354 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-6400 - 333 vs 324 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $94.05 vs $99.95
- Up to 10% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-6400 - $0.28 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
333
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280356 minutes ago
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |