Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i7-3770 - 182 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 15% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $80.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 13% better value when playing Stray than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
86%
Price, $
$94.05
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280346 minutes ago
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |