Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 932 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $94.05 vs $112.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-9400F - $0.56 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
168
89.36170212765957%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353980 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
93.33333333333334%
Price, $
$112
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |