Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than FX-8320 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-8320 - $94.05 vs $102.02
- Up to 13% better value when playing God of War than FX-8320 - $0.55 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280341 minutes ago
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |