Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1148 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-6350 - $94.05 vs $100.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Rust than FX-6350 - $0.51 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353956 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
83.78378378378379%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
78.46153846153847%
Price, $
$100
94%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353955 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |