Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $219.95 vs $522.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-13900K - $2.09 vs $3.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 31% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4150T - 138 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
105
76.08695652173914%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361412 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
55.145118733509236%
Price, $
$522.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
28.782784129119033%
Multi-Core
1742
8.646019456025412%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |