Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $219.95 vs $450.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.32 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-4150T - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 24 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
167
93.29608938547486%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361269 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
52.58964143426296%
Price, $
$450
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
49.50838635049161%
Multi-Core
1742
17.3678963110668%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |