Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $219.95 vs $458.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-12900 - $0.88 vs $1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 18% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150T - 294 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 24 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
249
84.6938775510204%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361278 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
56.41025641025641%
Price, $
$458
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
34.61382935705621%
Multi-Core
1742
13.354799141367678%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |