Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $219.95 vs $406.02
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 96% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4150T - 565 vs 289 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4150T - $0.72 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
289
51.1504424778761%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
94.73684210526315%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361291 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$406.02
54%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $406.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
30.333097094259394%
Multi-Core
1742
9.966245208535957%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |