Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $219.95 vs $567.98
- Up to 51% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-13900 - $1.34 vs $2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 27% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-4150T - 208 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 32 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
164
78.84615384615384%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361383 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.73/FPS
49.08424908424909%
Price, $
$567.98
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361383 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
31.54016212232867%
Multi-Core
1742
10.60513819554365%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |