Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $219.95 vs $490.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900K - $1.32 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-4150T - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 20 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
167
93.29608938547486%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361378 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
48.17518248175182%
Price, $
$490
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361379 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
48.94225271583762%
Multi-Core
1742
19.011240859980354%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |