Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1735 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 112% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 24 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $46.41 vs $145.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-9100 - $1.93 vs $2.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
67.95774647887323%
Price, $
$145
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
24
47.05882352941176%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.60551124002901%
Multi-Core
825
22.93577981651376%
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |