Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8300 - 167 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $47.98 vs $115.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-9100F - $0.31 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
44.92753623188406%
Price, $
$115
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349412 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
92.21556886227546%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |