Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240 - 167 vs 155 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $41.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-9100F - $0.26 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
37.68115942028986%
Price, $
$115
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
92.81437125748504%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
40.32023289665211%
Multi-Core
1137
30.98937040065413%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |