Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $115.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-13900 - $0.66 vs $2.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in God of War than Core i3-9100F - 194 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
89.69072164948454%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.93/FPS
22.525597269624573%
Price, $
$567.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
50.62638172439205%
Multi-Core
3669
22.336539632290272%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |