Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 621 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $115.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 85% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.42 vs $2.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 0% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-9100F - 278 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
277
99.64028776978418%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349039 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
14.788732394366196%
Price, $
$788.88
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
85.22561863173217%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |